[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<BL1PR12MB59225F7D902ACBC6A91511C3CBF42@BL1PR12MB5922.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 15:59:30 +0000
From: Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, Petr Machata
<petrm@...dia.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Network Development
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Alexei
Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper
Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, mlxsw <mlxsw@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 00/12] mlxsw: Preparations for XDP support
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2025 17:56
> To: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni
> <pabeni@...hat.com>; Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>; Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; Amit Cohen
> <amcohen@...dia.com>; Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>; Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>; Daniel Borkmann
> <daniel@...earbox.net>; Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>; John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>; bpf
> <bpf@...r.kernel.org>; mlxsw <mlxsw@...dia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/12] mlxsw: Preparations for XDP support
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 11:06 AM Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com> wrote:
> >
> > Amit Cohen writes:
> >
> > A future patch set will add support for XDP in mlxsw driver. This set adds
> > some preparations.
>
> Why?
> What is the goal here?
> My understanding is that mlxsw is a hw switch and skb-s are used to
> implement tap functionality for few listeners.
> The volume of such packets is supposed to be small.
> Even if XDP is added there is a huge mismatch in packet rates.
> Hence the question. Why bother?
You're right, most of packets should be handled by HW, XDP is mainly useful for telemetry.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists