lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoB70h4fMNy8rYmnCZuVfCi3cthoNHAtyUo7=X_Q5vq6nA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 09:15:00 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, 
	pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, 
	willemb@...gle.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, 
	eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, 
	john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, 
	haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/13] net-timestamp: make TCP tx timestamp
 bpf extension work

On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 9:03 AM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> On 1/28/25 12:46 AM, Jason Xing wrote:
> > Make partial of the feature work finally. After this, user can
>
> If it is "partial"-ly done, what is still missing?
>
> My understanding is after this patch, the BPF program can fully support the TX
> timestamping in TCP.

I'm going to make the change in the next version. My thought was a big
project supporting various protocols.

>
> > fully use the bpf prog to trace the tx path for TCP type.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
> > ---
> >   net/ipv4/tcp.c | 9 +++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > index 0d704bda6c41..0a41006b10d1 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > @@ -492,6 +492,15 @@ static void tcp_tx_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct sockcm_cookie *sockc)
> >               if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_RECORD_MASK)
> >                       shinfo->tskey = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + skb->len - 1;
> >       }
> > +
> > +     if (SK_BPF_CB_FLAG_TEST(sk, SK_BPF_CB_TX_TIMESTAMPING) && skb) {
> > +             struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
> > +             struct tcp_skb_cb *tcb = TCP_SKB_CB(skb);
> > +
> > +             tcb->txstamp_ack_bpf = 1;
> > +             shinfo->tx_flags |= SKBTX_BPF;
> > +             shinfo->tskey = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + skb->len - 1;
> > +     }
> >   }
> >
> >   static bool tcp_stream_is_readable(struct sock *sk, int target)
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ