[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250205155120.1676781-13-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 15:51:20 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 net 12/12] ipv6: Use RCU in ip6_input()
Instead of grabbing rcu_read_lock() from ip6_input_finish(),
do it earlier in is caller, so that ip6_input() access
to dev_net() can be validated by LOCKDEP.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv6/ip6_input.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
index 70c0e16c0ae6837d1c64d0036829c8b61799578b..39da6a7ce5f1245145dd74d4ac4eae63dd970939 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
@@ -477,9 +477,7 @@ void ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr,
static int ip6_input_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
skb_clear_delivery_time(skb);
- rcu_read_lock();
ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu(net, skb, 0, false);
- rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
@@ -487,9 +485,15 @@ static int ip6_input_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *sk
int ip6_input(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- return NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_IPV6, NF_INET_LOCAL_IN,
- dev_net(skb->dev), NULL, skb, skb->dev, NULL,
- ip6_input_finish);
+ int res;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ res = NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_IPV6, NF_INET_LOCAL_IN,
+ dev_net_rcu(skb->dev), NULL, skb, skb->dev, NULL,
+ ip6_input_finish);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return res;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ip6_input);
--
2.48.1.362.g079036d154-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists