[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6OkhzUHMPuSD6YM@shredder>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 19:48:55 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc: Ted Chen <znscnchen@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vxlan_rcv(): Update comment to inlucde
ipv6
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 2/5/25 14:40, Ted Chen wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 02:12:50PM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> >> On 2/5/25 13:44, Ted Chen wrote:
> >>> Update the comment to indicate that both net/ipv4/udp.c and net/ipv6/udp.c
> >>> invoke vxlan_rcv() to process packets.
> >>>
> >>> The comment aligns with that for vxlan_err_lookup().
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ted Chen <znscnchen@...il.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> >>> index 5ef40ac816cc..8bdf91d1fdfe 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> >>> @@ -1684,7 +1684,7 @@ static bool vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(struct vxlan_sock *vs, void *oiph,
> >>> return err <= 1;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -/* Callback from net/ipv4/udp.c to receive packets */
> >>> +/* Callback from net/ipv{4,6}/udp.c to receive packets */
> >>> static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>> {
> >>> struct vxlan_vni_node *vninode = NULL;
> >>
> >> Your subject has a typo
> >> s/inlucde/include
> > Oops. Sorry for that.
> >
> >> IMO these comments are unnecessary, encap_rcv callers are trivial to find.
> > I'm fine with either way. No comment is better than a wrong comment.
> > Please let me know if I need to send a new version to correct the subject or
> > remove the comments for both vxlan_rcv() and vxlan_err_lookup().
> >
>
> Up to you, I don't have a strong preference. You have to wait 24 hours
> before posting another version anyway, so you have time to decide. :)
Looks like nobody will miss these comments, so I think they can be
safely removed in v2 :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists