[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6LTHDR2OIHGM2y7@LQ3V64L9R2>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 18:55:24 -0800
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@...gle.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller " <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
almasrymina@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] net: Create separate gro_flush helper
function
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 12:10:50AM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> Move multiple copies of same code snippet doing `gro_flush` and
> `gro_normal_list` into a separate helper function.
Like the other patch, this one could probably be sent on its own. I
think if you want to include it in your series, that's fine, but I
think factoring this out into helpers is good clean up.
> Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@...gle.com>
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 50fb234dd7a0..d5dcf9dd6225 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -6484,6 +6484,17 @@ static void skb_defer_free_flush(struct softnet_data *sd)
> }
> }
>
> +static void __napi_gro_flush_helper(struct napi_struct *napi)
I wonder if this could be changed to take a boolean as a second arg
then you could also use this helper in napi_complete_done in
addition to the locations you've already cleaned up?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists