netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] Device memory TCP TX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHS8izNxi+Dc6mXPNaQSjtmz5YzmeA-Sn8JdMWLpYRomJdCWMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 11:52:20 -0800
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, 
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, 
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, 
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, 
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>, 
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, 
	sdf@...ichev.me, asml.silence@...il.com, dw@...idwei.uk, 
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Victor Nogueira <victor@...atatu.com>, 
	Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>, Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] Device memory TCP TX

On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 6:08 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon,  3 Feb 2025 22:39:10 +0000 Mina Almasry wrote:
> > v3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=929401&state=*
> > ===
> >
> > RFC v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=920056&state=*
>
> nit: lore links are better
>

Will do.

> please stick to RFC until a driver implementation is ready and
> included

For the RX path proposals I kept the driver implementation out of the
series and linked to it in the cover letter. Just to confirm, is that
OK for this series as well?

-- 
Thanks,
Mina