[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67a3ea6d8432e_2ee27529434@iweiny-mobl.notmuch>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 16:47:09 -0600
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: <alucerop@....com>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <edward.cree@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<dave.jiang@...el.com>
CC: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 15/26] sfc: obtain root decoder with enough HPA free
space
alucerop@ wrote:
> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
[snip]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
> index 774e1cb4b1cb..a9ff84143e5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
> struct pci_dev *pci_dev = efx->pci_dev;
> DECLARE_BITMAP(expected, CXL_MAX_CAPS);
> DECLARE_BITMAP(found, CXL_MAX_CAPS);
> + resource_size_t max_size;
> struct mds_info sfc_mds_info;
> struct efx_cxl *cxl;
>
> @@ -102,6 +103,24 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
> goto err_regs;
> }
>
> + cxl->cxlrd = cxl_get_hpa_freespace(cxl->cxlmd, 1,
> + CXL_DECODER_F_RAM | CXL_DECODER_F_TYPE2,
Won't the addition of CXL_DECODER_F_TYPE2 cause this to fail? I'm not
seeing CXL_DECODER_F_TYPE2 set on a decoder in any of the patches. So
won't that make the flags check fail? Why is CXL_DECODER_F_RAM not
enough?
Ira
[snip]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists