netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add support for Timesync Interrupt Router

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cecaf839-c203-43a5-aa11-f428ab0ba4c2@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:48:39 +0530
From: Chintan Vankar <c-vankar@...com>
To: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Jason Reeder <jreeder@...com>,
        <nm@...com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski
	<kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
        Thomas Gleixner
	<tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <srk@...com>,
        <s-vadapalli@...com>, <danishanwar@...com>, <m-malladi@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add support for Timesync Interrupt Router



On 06/02/25 10:43, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/02/25 21:31, Chintan Vankar wrote:
>> Chintan Vankar (2):
>>    irqchip: ti-tsir: Add support for Timesync Interrupt Router
>>    net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpts: Add support to configure GenF signal for
>>      CPTS
>>
>>   drivers/irqchip/Kconfig             |   9 +++
>>   drivers/irqchip/Makefile            |   1 +
>>   drivers/irqchip/ti-timesync-intr.c  | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpts.c |  21 ++++++
>>   4 files changed, 140 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/ti-timesync-intr.c
> 
> Where are the device-tree binding updates that need to go with
> individual driver changes?
> 


Hello Vignesh, This series is not specific to any use-case that Timesync
Interrupt Router is implementing. Through this RFC series I am expecting
a feedback on driver implementation so that later on we can make use of
this driver to implement certain functionality.

Regards,
Chintan.