netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/7] tun: Extract the vnet handling code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1c2a1bd6-9ce9-47d8-b89d-1a647575ce07@daynix.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:58:34 +0900
From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Xuan Zhuo
 <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
 virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@...nix.com>,
 Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@...nix.com>,
 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>, gur.stavi@...wei.com,
 devel@...nix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/7] tun: Extract the vnet handling code

On 2025/02/06 6:12, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Akihiko Odaki wrote:
>> The vnet handling code will be reused by tap.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>
>> ---
>>   MAINTAINERS            |   2 +-
>>   drivers/net/tun.c      | 179 +----------------------------------------------
>>   drivers/net/tun_vnet.h | 184 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-)
> 
>> -static inline bool tun_legacy_is_little_endian(unsigned int flags)
>> -{
>> -	return !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TUN_VNET_CROSS_LE) &&
>> -		 (flags & TUN_VNET_BE)) &&
>> -		virtio_legacy_is_little_endian();
>> -}
> 
>> +static inline bool tun_vnet_legacy_is_little_endian(unsigned int flags)
>> +{
>> +	return !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TUN_VNET_CROSS_LE) &&
>> +		 (flags & TUN_VNET_BE)) &&
>> +		virtio_legacy_is_little_endian();
>> +}
> 
> In general LGTM. But why did you rename functions while moving them?
> Please add an explanation in the commit message for any non obvious
> changes like that.

I renamed them to clarify they are in a distinct, decoupled part of 
code. It was obvious in the previous version as they are static 
functions contained in a translation unit, but now they are part of a 
header file so I'm clarifying that with this rename. I will add this 
explanation to the commit message.