netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdU5tt5_t2SfYO3OUsHenu_0PhpKeLHktNdCx-W6zCEymw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:10:33 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, 
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, 
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, 
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, 
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, 
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, 
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep()

Hi David,

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 23:48, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
> Add a new gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep() helper function with fewer
> parameters than gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep().
>
> Calling gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep() can get quite verbose. In many
> cases, the first arguments all come from the same struct gpio_descs, so
> having a separate function where we can just pass that cuts down on the
> boilerplate.
>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/include/linux/gpio/consumer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gpio/consumer.h
> @@ -655,4 +655,11 @@ static inline void gpiod_unexport(struct gpio_desc *desc)
>
>  #endif /* CONFIG_GPIOLIB && CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS */
>
> +static inline int gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep(struct gpio_descs *descs,
> +                                                unsigned long *value_bitmap)
> +{
> +       return gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(descs->ndescs, descs->desc,
> +                                             descs->info, value_bitmap);

I am wondering whether this needs a check for !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(descs),
to handle the !CONFIG_GPIOLIB and gpiod_get_array_optional() cases?

Slightly related: shouldn't gpiod_put_array() (both the implementation
and the !CONFIG_GPIOLIB dummy) allow the caller to pass NULL, to
streamline the gpiod_get_array_optional() case?

> +}
> +
>  #endif

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds