netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] gpio: max3191x: use gpiod_multi_set_value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcNJzPH8to1Y6NzPMXnH48Ve4LJ7oid7_wEHtwhO82Fmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 12:34:58 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, 
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, 
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, 
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, 
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, 
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, 
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] gpio: max3191x: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep

On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 12:48 AM David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
>
> Reduce verbosity by using gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep() instead of
> gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep().

It seems you missed my comment.

> +static void gpiod_set_array_single_value_cansleep(struct gpio_descs *descs,
>                                                   int value)

This is not good namespacing. Can we change this while at it?

max3191x_...

(I would go with max3191x_set_modesel_pins() to make it shorter. I
have no clue why the function repeats so much from gpiod API naming.
Is there anything else which is named in a similar way? Perhaps fix it
by a separate patch?)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko