netdev - Re: [PATCH v17 1/1] mctp pcc: Implement MCTP over PCC Transport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1b38b084be4dd7167e80709d3b960ac1b4952af3.camel@codeconstruct.com.au>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 08:30:52 +0800
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>
To: Adam Young <admiyo@...eremail.onmicrosoft.com>, 
 admiyo@...amperecomputing.com, Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>, 
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
 <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla
	 <sudeep.holla@....com>, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, 
	Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 1/1] mctp pcc: Implement MCTP over PCC Transport

Hi Adam,

> Is that your only concern with this patch?

Yes, hence the ack. If there are other changes that you end up doing in
response to other reviews, then please address the spacing thing too,
but that certainly doesn't warrant a new revision on its own.

> What else would need to happen in order for this to get ACKed at this
> point?

It already has an ack from me.

As for actual merging: If the netdev maintainers have further reviews,
please address those. If not, I assume they would merge in this window.

Cheers,

Jeremy