[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6Vm3ny5VN6mcKJN@archie.me>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:50:22 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
rdunlap@...radead.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 8/8] netconsole: docs: Add documentation for
CPU number auto-population
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:05:59AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> +.. note::
> +
> + If the user has set a conflicting `cpu` key in the userdata dictionary,
> + both keys will be reported, with the kernel-populated entry appearing after
> + the user one. For example::
In that case, shouldn't the kernel autopopulates numbers of the rest of
CPUs?
Confused...
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists