netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] unroll: add generic loop unroll helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250209110725.GB554665@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:07:25 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	"Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@...cle.com>,
	Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
	Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
	Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] unroll: add generic loop unroll helpers

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 07:26:26PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> There are cases when we need to explicitly unroll loops. For example,
> cache operations, filling DMA descriptors on very high speeds etc.
> Add compiler-specific attribute macros to give the compiler a hint
> that we'd like to unroll a loop.
> Example usage:
> 
>  #define UNROLL_BATCH 8
> 
> 	unrolled_count(UNROLL_BATCH)
> 	for (u32 i = 0; i < UNROLL_BATCH; i++)
> 		op(priv, i);
> 
> Note that sometimes the compilers won't unroll loops if they think this
> would have worse optimization and perf than without unrolling, and that
> unroll attributes are available only starting GCC 8. For older compiler
> versions, no hints/attributes will be applied.
> For better unrolling/parallelization, don't have any variables that
> interfere between iterations except for the iterator itself.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@...cle.com> # pragmas
> Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>

Hi Alexander,

This patch adds four variants of the unrolled helper.  But as far as I can
tell the patch-set only makes use of one of them, unrolled_count().

I think it would be best if this patch only added helpers that are used.

...