[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b1b3e5e1-b1fe-4816-85eb-61ac7ea2d46d@engleder-embedded.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 21:14:33 +0100
From: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] igb: Get rid of spurious interrupts
On 10.02.25 10:19, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> When running the igc with XDP/ZC in busy polling mode with deferral of hard
> interrupts, interrupts still happen from time to time. That is caused by
> the igc task watchdog which triggers Rx interrupts periodically.
igc or igb?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists