lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250211071922.2311873-2-junnan01.wu@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:19:21 +0800
From: Junnan Wu <junnan01.wu@...sung.com>
To: stefanha@...hat.com, sgarzare@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com,
	jasowang@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, eperezma@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, q1.huang@...sung.com, ying01.gao@...sung.com,
	ying123.xu@...sung.com, lei19.wang@...sung.com, Junnan Wu
	<junnan01.wu@...sung.com>
Subject: [Patch net 1/2] vsock/virtio: initialize rx_buf_nr and
 rx_buf_max_nr when resuming

When executing suspend to ram twice in a row,
the `rx_buf_nr` and `rx_buf_max_nr` increase to three times vq->num_free.
Then after virtqueue_get_buf and `rx_buf_nr` decreased
in function virtio_transport_rx_work,
the condition to fill rx buffer
(rx_buf_nr < rx_buf_max_nr / 2) will never be met.

It is because that `rx_buf_nr` and `rx_buf_max_nr`
are initialized only in virtio_vsock_probe(),
but they should be reset whenever virtqueues are recreated,
like after a suspend/resume.

Move the `rx_buf_nr` and `rx_buf_max_nr` initialization in
virtio_vsock_vqs_init(), so we are sure that they are properly
initialized, every time we initialize the virtqueues, either when we
load the driver or after a suspend/resume.
At the same time, also move `queued_replies`.

Fixes: bd50c5dc182b ("vsock/virtio: add support for device suspend/resume")
Co-developed-by: Ying Gao <ying01.gao@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ying Gao <ying01.gao@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Junnan Wu <junnan01.wu@...sung.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
index b58c3818f284..f0e48e6911fc 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
@@ -670,6 +670,13 @@ static int virtio_vsock_vqs_init(struct virtio_vsock *vsock)
 	};
 	int ret;
 
+	mutex_lock(&vsock->rx_lock);
+	vsock->rx_buf_nr = 0;
+	vsock->rx_buf_max_nr = 0;
+	mutex_unlock(&vsock->rx_lock);
+
+	atomic_set(&vsock->queued_replies, 0);
+
 	ret = virtio_find_vqs(vdev, VSOCK_VQ_MAX, vsock->vqs, vqs_info, NULL);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
@@ -779,9 +786,6 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 
 	vsock->vdev = vdev;
 
-	vsock->rx_buf_nr = 0;
-	vsock->rx_buf_max_nr = 0;
-	atomic_set(&vsock->queued_replies, 0);
 
 	mutex_init(&vsock->tx_lock);
 	mutex_init(&vsock->rx_lock);
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ