[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+oUCt2VGvrbrweniTendZFEh+nwS=uonc004-aPkWy-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:43:30 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Yael Chemla <ychemla@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net 1/2] net: Fix dev_net(dev) race in unregister_netdevice_notifier_dev_net().
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 6:13 AM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> After the cited commit, dev_net(dev) is fetched before holding RTNL
> and passed to __unregister_netdevice_notifier_net().
>
> However, dev_net(dev) might be different after holding RTNL.
>
> In the reported case [0], while removing a VF device, its netns was
> being dismantled and the VF was moved to init_net.
>
> So the following sequence is basically illegal when dev was fetched
> without lookup:
>
> net = dev_net(dev);
> rtnl_net_lock(net);
>
> Let's use a new helper rtnl_net_dev_lock() to fix the race.
>
> It fetches dev_net_rcu(dev), bumps its net->passive, and checks if
> dev_net_rcu(dev) is changed after rtnl_net_lock().
>
>
> Fixes: 7fb1073300a2 ("net: Hold rtnl_net_lock() in (un)?register_netdevice_notifier_dev_net().")
> Reported-by: Yael Chemla <ychemla@...dia.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/146eabfe-123c-4970-901e-e961b4c09bc3@nvidia.com/
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
> ---
> v3:
> * Bump net->passive instead of maybe_get_net()
> * Remove msleep(1) loop
> * Use rcu_access_pointer() instead of rcu_read_lock().
>
> v2:
> * Use dev_net_rcu().
> * Use msleep(1) instead of cond_resched() after maybe_get_net()
> * Remove cond_resched() after net_eq() check
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250130232435.43622-2-kuniyu@amazon.com/
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 55e356a68db6..1248fb368e78 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -2070,6 +2070,35 @@ static void __move_netdevice_notifier_net(struct net *src_net,
> __register_netdevice_notifier_net(dst_net, nb, true);
> }
>
> +static void rtnl_net_dev_lock(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct net *net;
> +
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> +again:
#endif
> + /* netns might be being dismantled. */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + net = dev_net_rcu(dev);
> + refcount_inc(&net->passive);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + rtnl_net_lock(net);
> +
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> + /* dev might have been moved to another netns. */
> + if (!net_eq(net, rcu_access_pointer(dev->nd_net.net))) {
> + rtnl_net_unlock(net);
> + net_drop_ns(net);
> + goto again;
> + }
#endif
Or perhaps not use net_drop_ns() and rename/export net_free() to
net_passive_dec() ?
diff --git a/include/net/net_namespace.h b/include/net/net_namespace.h
index 7ba1402ca7796663bed3373b1a0c6a0249cd1599..62d1a1c39547bd5cca71082b8172d453b56a96db
100644
--- a/include/net/net_namespace.h
+++ b/include/net/net_namespace.h
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static inline int check_net(const struct net *net)
}
void net_drop_ns(void *);
-
+void net_passive_dec(struct net *net);
#else
static inline struct net *get_net(struct net *net)
@@ -326,6 +326,11 @@ static inline int check_net(const struct net *net)
}
#define net_drop_ns NULL
+static inline void net_passive_dec(struct net *net)
+{
+ refcount_dec(&net->passive);
+}
+
#endif
/* Returns true if the netns initialization is completed successfully */
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index cb39a12b2f8295c605f08b5589932932150a1644..4303f2a4926243e2c0ff0c0387383cd8e0658019
100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static void net_complete_free(void)
}
-static void net_free(struct net *net)
+void net_passive_dec(struct net *net)
{
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&net->passive)) {
kfree(rcu_access_pointer(net->gen));
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ void net_drop_ns(void *p)
struct net *net = (struct net *)p;
if (net)
- net_free(net);
+ net_passive_dec(net);
}
struct net *copy_net_ns(unsigned long flags,
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ struct net *copy_net_ns(unsigned long flags,
key_remove_domain(net->key_domain);
#endif
put_user_ns(user_ns);
- net_free(net);
+ net_passive_dec(net);
dec_ucounts:
dec_net_namespaces(ucounts);
return ERR_PTR(rv);
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ static void cleanup_net(struct work_struct *work)
key_remove_domain(net->key_domain);
#endif
put_user_ns(net->user_ns);
- net_free(net);
+ net_passive_dec(net);
}
cleanup_net_task = NULL;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists