[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <43A1F6A5-2F22-4A4B-ACAE-EEEC8A5B889A@net-swift.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:14:39 +0800
From: "mengyuanlou@...-swift.com" <mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jiawenwu@...stnetic.com,
duanqiangwen@...-swift.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 4/6] net: libwx: Add msg task func
> 2025年2月8日 09:17,Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> 写道:
>
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:37:48 +0800 mengyuanlou wrote:
>> +static int wx_negotiate_vf_api(struct wx *wx, u32 *msgbuf, u32 vf)
>> +{
>> + int api = msgbuf[1];
>> +
>> + switch (api) {
>> + case wx_mbox_api_10 ... wx_mbox_api_13:
>> + wx->vfinfo[vf].vf_api = api;
>> + return 0;
>> + default:
>> + wx_err(wx, "VF %d requested invalid api version %u\n", vf, api);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +}
>
> How "compatible" is your device with IXGBE?
>
The pfvf mailbox flow is similar to IXGBE.
But compatibility with the previous api seems not to be required,
because inbox has been refactored.
> static int ixgbe_negotiate_vf_api(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
> u32 *msgbuf, u32 vf)
> {
> int api = msgbuf[1];
>
> switch (api) {
> case ixgbe_mbox_api_10:
> case ixgbe_mbox_api_11:
> case ixgbe_mbox_api_12:
> case ixgbe_mbox_api_13:
> case ixgbe_mbox_api_14:
> adapter->vfinfo[vf].vf_api = api;
> return 0;
> default:
> break;
> }
>
> e_dbg(drv, "VF %d requested unsupported api version %u\n", vf, api);
>
> return -1;
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists