[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250211-accurate-quail-from-saturn-4beac1@leitao>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 03:41:11 -0800
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
horms@...nel.org, kernel-team@...a.com, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, ushankar@...estorage.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: core: improvements to device lookup
by hardware address.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:09:27AM +0900, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 03:56:12 -0800
> > The first patch adds a new dev_getbyhwaddr() helper function for
>
> nit: second
>
> > finding devices by hardware address when the RTNL lock is held. This
> > prevents PROVE_LOCKING warnings that occurred when RTNL was held but the
>
> Same comment for patch 2, this itself doens't fix the warning.
> Also, patch 2 & 3 should be net.git materials ? Maybe squash
> the two and add a Fixes tag then.
I am not sure this should be against net, since the main user of it will
be targeting net-next.
Also, I don't see it as a fix itself, but a new API that users can
leverage once it is landed, thus, focusing on net-next.
Thanks for the review
--breno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists