[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250210181635.2c84f2e1@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 18:16:35 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ahmed.zaki@...el.com, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet
<corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org (open list:DOCUMENTATION),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] documentation: networking: Add NAPI config
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 01:28:21 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
> +Persistent NAPI config
> +----------------------
> +
> +Drivers can opt-in to using a persistent NAPI configuration space by calling
Should we be more forceful? I think for new drivers the _add_config()
API should always be preferred given the benefits.
> +netif_napi_add_config. This API maps a NAPI instance to a configuration
> +structure using a driver defined index value, like a queue number. If the
> +driver were to destroy and recreate NAPI instances (if a user requested a queue
"were" is correct here?
> +count change, for example), the new NAPI instances will inherit the configuration
> +settings of the NAPI configuration structure they are mapped to.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists