[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a87737d-6677-4fee-989f-47964f782725@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:08:15 +0200
From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Carolina Jubran <cjubran@...dia.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] Rate management on traffic classes + misc
On 12/02/2025 5:36, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 12:17:01 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
..
> Tariq, LMK if you want me to apply the patches starting from patch 6.
Yes, please apply.
> The rest of the series looks good. Two process notes, FWIW:
> - pretty sure we agreed in the past that it's okay to have patches
> which significantly extend uAPI or core to be handled outside of
> the main "driver update stream"; what "significant" means may take
> a bit of trial and error but I can't think of any misunderstandings
> so far
> - from my PoV it'd be perfectly fine if you were to submit multiple
> series at once if they are independent. Just as long as there's not
> more than 15 patches for either tree outstanding. But I understand
> that comes at it's own cost
>
Ack.
That sounds good.
Can be helpful in some cases.
Regards,
Tariq
Powered by blists - more mailing lists