[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB62974D04CFBC8CEF7072F4259BFC2@SJ1PR11MB6297.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:10:41 +0000
From: "Salin, Samuel" <samuel.salin@...el.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, "Zaki, Ahmed" <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
CC: "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Chittim, Madhu"
<madhu.chittim@...el.com>, Sudheer Mogilappagari
<sudheer.mogilappagari@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: synchronize pending IRQs
after disable
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On Behalf Of
> Simon Horman
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2025 10:30 AM
> To: Zaki, Ahmed <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
> Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Chittim, Madhu
> <madhu.chittim@...el.com>; Sudheer Mogilappagari
> <sudheer.mogilappagari@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: synchronize pending IRQs
> after disable
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 06:42:57AM -0700, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
> > Wait for pending IRQ handler after it is disabled. This will ensure
> > the IRQ is cleanly freed afterwards.
> >
> > Fixes: d4d558718266 ("idpf: initialize interrupts and enable vport")
> > Reviewed-by: Madhu Chittim <madhu.chittim@...el.com>
> > Suggested-by: Sudheer Mogilappagari <sudheer.mogilappagari@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Samuel Salin <Samuel.salin@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists