[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250211195934.47943371@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:59:34 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Lei Wei <quic_leiwei@...cinc.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_kkumarcs@...cinc.com>,
<quic_suruchia@...cinc.com>, <quic_pavir@...cinc.com>,
<quic_linchen@...cinc.com>, <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>,
<srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
<vsmuthu@....qualcomm.com>, <john@...ozen.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] Add PCS support for Qualcomm IPQ9574
SoC
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 23:53:11 +0800 Lei Wei wrote:
> The 'UNIPHY' PCS block in the Qualcomm IPQ9574 SoC provides Ethernet
> PCS and SerDes functions. It supports 1Gbps mode PCS and 10-Gigabit
> mode PCS (XPCS) functions, and supports various interface modes for
> the connectivity between the Ethernet MAC and the external PHYs/Switch.
> There are three UNIPHY (PCS) instances in IPQ9574, supporting the six
> Ethernet ports.
>
> This patch series adds base driver support for initializing the PCS,
> and PCS phylink ops for managing the PCS modes/states. Support for
> SGMII/QSGMII (PCS) and USXGMII (XPCS) modes is being added initially.
>
> The Ethernet driver which handles the MAC operations will create the
> PCS instances and phylink for the MAC, by utilizing the API exported
> by this driver.
>
> While support is being added initially for IPQ9574, the driver is
> expected to be easily extendable later for other SoCs in the IPQ
> family such as IPQ5332.
Could someone with PHY, or even, dare I say, phylink expertise
take a look here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists