netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net: document return value of dev_getbyhwaddr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250213073646.14847-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:36:46 +0900
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <leitao@...ian.org>
CC: <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <horms@...nel.org>, <kernel-team@...a.com>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>, <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, <ushankar@...estorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net: document return value of dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu()

From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:47:24 -0800
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index d5ab9a4b318ea4926c200ef20dae01eaafa18c6b..0b3480a125fcaa6f036ddf219c29fa362ea0cb29 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -1134,8 +1134,8 @@ int netdev_get_name(struct net *net, char *name, int ifindex)
>   *	The returned device has not had its ref count increased
>   *	and the caller must therefore be careful about locking
>   *
> + *	Return: pointer to the net_device, or NULL if not found
>   */

I noticed here we still mention RTNL and it should be removed.

Could you update the comment like this to remove RTNL and fix
mis-aligned notes ?

---8<---
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index d5ab9a4b318e..c0d6017a3840 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1123,17 +1123,17 @@ int netdev_get_name(struct net *net, char *name, int ifindex)
 }
 
 /**
- *	dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu - find a device by its hardware address
- *	@net: the applicable net namespace
- *	@type: media type of device
- *	@ha: hardware address
+ * dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu - find a device by its hardware address
+ * @net: the applicable net namespace
+ * @type: media type of device
+ * @ha: hardware address
  *
- *	Search for an interface by MAC address. Returns NULL if the device
- *	is not found or a pointer to the device.
- *	The caller must hold RCU or RTNL.
- *	The returned device has not had its ref count increased
- *	and the caller must therefore be careful about locking
+ * Search for an interface by MAC address.  The returned device has
+ * not had its ref count increased and the caller must therefore be
+ * careful about locking
  *
+ * Context: The caller must hold RCU.
+ * Return: pointer to the net_device, or NULL if not found
  */
 
 struct net_device *dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu(struct net *net, unsigned short type,
---8<---

Thanks!