[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250213010457.1351376-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:04:57 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
horms@...nel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
willemb@...gle.com,
ecree.xilinx@...il.com,
neescoba@...co.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next] netdev: clarify GSO vs csum in qstats
Could be just me, but I had to pause and double check that the Tx csum
counter in qstat should include GSO'd packets. GSO pretty much implies
csum so one could possibly interpret the csum counter as pure csum offload.
But the counters are based on virtio:
[tx_needs_csum]
The number of packets which require checksum calculation by the device.
[rx_needs_csum]
The number of packets with VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM.
and VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM gets set on GSO packets virtio sends.
Clarify this in the spec to avoid any confusion.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
CC: willemb@...gle.com
CC: ecree.xilinx@...il.com
CC: neescoba@...co.com
---
Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml b/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml
index 288923e965ae..0b311dc49691 100644
--- a/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml
@@ -457,6 +457,8 @@ name: netdev
name: tx-needs-csum
doc: |
Number of packets that required the device to calculate the checksum.
+ This counter includes the number of GSO wire packets for which device
+ calculated the L4 checksum (which means pretty much all of them).
type: uint
-
name: tx-hw-gso-packets
--
2.48.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists