[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250213083217.77e18e10@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:32:17 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Yael Chemla <ychemla@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net 2/3] net: Fix dev_net(dev) race in
unregister_netdevice_notifier_dev_net().
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:42:05 +0900 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> +static void rtnl_net_dev_lock(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct net *net;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> +again:
> +#endif
> + /* netns might be being dismantled. */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + net = dev_net_rcu(dev);
> + net_passive_inc(net);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + rtnl_net_lock(net);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> + /* dev might have been moved to another netns. */
> + if (!net_eq(net, rcu_access_pointer(dev->nd_net.net))) {
> + rtnl_net_unlock(net);
> + net_passive_dec(net);
> + goto again;
> + }
> +#endif
Is there a plan to clean this up in net-next? Or perhaps after Eric's
dev_net() work? Otherwise I'm tempted to suggest to use a loop, maybe:
bool again;
do {
again = false;
/* netns might be being dismantled. */
rcu_read_lock();
net = dev_net_rcu(dev);
net_passive_inc(net);
rcu_read_unlock();
rtnl_net_lock(net);
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
/* dev might have been moved to another netns. */
if (!net_eq(net, rcu_access_pointer(dev->nd_net.net))) {
rtnl_net_unlock(net);
net_passive_dec(net);
again = true;
}
#endif
} while (again);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists