lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173947119037.339941.1732579278867629226.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:26:30 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, 
 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, 
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, 
 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, 
 Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, 
 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, 
 Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, 
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, 
 Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, 
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
 Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, 
 Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, 
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, 
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, 
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, 
 Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib: add
 gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep

On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:33:26 -0600, David Lechner wrote:
> This series was inspired by some minor annoyance I have experienced a
> few times in recent reviews.
> 
> Calling gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep() can be quite verbose due to
> having so many parameters. In most cases, we already have a struct
> gpio_descs that contains the first 3 parameters so we end up with 3 (or
> often even 6) pointer indirections at each call site. Also, people have
> a tendency to want to hard-code the first argument instead of using
> struct gpio_descs.ndescs, often without checking that ndescs >= the
> hard-coded value.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[15/15] ASoC: adau1701: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
        commit: ad0fbcebb5f6e093d433a0873758a2778d747eb8

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ