netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 5/6] net: ngbe: add sriov function support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250212180912.7dc3e3cf@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:09:12 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "mengyuanlou@...-swift.com" <mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiawenwu@...stnetic.com,
 duanqiangwen@...-swift.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 5/6] net: ngbe: add sriov function support

On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:06:52 +0800 mengyuanlou@...-swift.com wrote:
> > The goal should be to make sure the right handler is register
> > for the IRQ, or at least do the muxing earlier in a safe fashion.
> > Not decide that it was a packet IRQ half way thru a function called
> > ngbe_msix_other  
> 
> Whether the first way(Alloc 9 irq vectors, but only request_irq for 0
> and 8) can be better than reuse vector 0 in the real?

I don't understand, sorry.