lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a03f54be-b558-4964-8e40-b5f2bb8e7158@uliege.be>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 23:37:22 +0100
From: Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@...ege.be>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
 Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>, David Lebrun <dlebrun@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/3] net: ipv6: fix dst ref loops on input in rpl
 and seg6 lwtunnels

On 2/13/25 13:27, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:16:22PM +0100, Justin Iurman wrote:
>> As a follow up to commit 92191dd10730 ("net: ipv6: fix dst ref loops in
>> rpl, seg6 and ioam6 lwtunnels"), we also need a conditional dst cache on
>> input for seg6_iptunnel and rpl_iptunnel to prevent dst ref loops (i.e.,
>> if the packet destination did not change, we may end up recording a
>> reference to the lwtunnel in its own cache, and the lwtunnel state will
>> never be freed).
>>
>> Fixes: a7a29f9c361f ("net: ipv6: add rpl sr tunnel")
>> Fixes: af4a2209b134 ("ipv6: sr: use dst_cache in seg6_input")
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@...ege.be>
>> Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
>> Cc: David Lebrun <dlebrun@...gle.com>
> 
> Not an expert but was asked to take a look. Seems consistent with the
> output path and comparing the state address seems safe as it is only
> compared and never dereferenced after dropping the dst in the input
> path.
> 
> I would have probably split it into two patches to make it a bit easier
> to backport. 5.4.y needs the seg6 fix, but not the rpl one.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>

Thanks Ido. I'll split it in two for v3.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ