netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add rto max for bpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL+tcoBxVyEW_q0d0EBbtk7370dXkrON9GvJ2dr4SpKz-c0VFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:13:44 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
	daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org, 
	eddyz87@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, horms@...nel.org, 
	john.fastabend@...il.com, jolsa@...nel.org, kpsingh@...nel.org, 
	kuba@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, ncardwell@...gle.com, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, sdf@...ichev.me, song@...nel.org, 
	yonghong.song@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add rto max for
 bpf_setsockopt test

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:30 AM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:43:54 +0800
> > Add TCP_BPF_RTO_MAX selftests for active and passive flows
> > in the BPF_SOCK_OPS_ACTIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB and
> > BPF_SOCK_OPS_PASSIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB bpf callbacks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c          | 28 +++++++++++++------
> >  .../bpf/progs/test_tcp_hdr_options.c          | 26 +++++++++++++++++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/test_tcp_hdr_options.h      |  3 ++
>
> It would be nice to update sol_tcp_testsp[] with TCP_RTO_MAX_MS
> in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/setget_sockopt.c.

Sure, it's not hard to add this test.

Thanks,
Jason