[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <039bfa0d-3d61-488e-9205-bef39499db6e@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:14:06 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com,
song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
horms@...nel.org, ncardwell@...gle.com, kuniyu@...zon.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] bpf: add TCP_BPF_RTO_MAX for bpf_setsockopt
On 2/13/25 3:57 PM, Jason Xing wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 7:41 AM Stanislav Fomichev<stfomichev@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 02/13, Jason Xing wrote:
>>> Support bpf_setsockopt() to set the maximum value of RTO for
>>> BPF program.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing<kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst | 3 ++-
>>> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
>>> net/core/filter.c | 6 ++++++
>>> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
>>> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
>>> index 054561f8dcae..78eb0959438a 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
>>> @@ -1241,7 +1241,8 @@ tcp_rto_min_us - INTEGER
>>>
>>> tcp_rto_max_ms - INTEGER
>>> Maximal TCP retransmission timeout (in ms).
>>> - Note that TCP_RTO_MAX_MS socket option has higher precedence.
>>> + Note that TCP_BPF_RTO_MAX and TCP_RTO_MAX_MS socket option have the
>>> + higher precedence for configuring this setting.
>> The cover letter needs more explanation about the motivation.
+1
I haven't looked at the patches. The cover letter has no word on the use case.
Using test_tcp_hdr_options.c as the test is unnecessarily complicated just for
adding a new optname support. setget_sockopt.c is the right test to reuse.
> I am targeting the net-next tree because of recent changes[1] made by
> Eric. It probably hasn't merged into the bpf-next tree.
There is the bpf-next/net tree. It should have the needed changes.
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists