[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53a47904-cb6c-4d76-86fd-2f78b911833c@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:03:19 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Bryan Whitehead <bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Marcin Wojtas <marcin.s.wojtas@...il.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: stmmac: convert to phylink managed EEE
support
On 14/02/2025 11:21, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:58:55AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Thanks for the feedback. So ...
>>
>> 1. I can confirm that suspend works if I disable EEE via ethtool
>> 2. Prior to this change I do see phy_eee_rx_clock_stop being called
>> to enable the clock resuming from suspend, but after this change
>> it is not.
>>
>> Prior to this change I see (note the prints around 389-392 are when
>> we resume from suspend) ...
>>
>> [ 4.654454] Broadcom BCM89610 stmmac-0:00: phy_eee_rx_clock_stop: clk_stop_enable 0
>
> This is a bug in phylink - it shouldn't have been calling
> phy_eee_rx_clock_stop() where a MAC doesn't support phylink managed EEE.
>
>> [ 4.723123] dwc-eth-dwmac 2490000.ethernet eth0: configuring for phy/rgmii link mode
>> [ 7.629652] Broadcom BCM89610 stmmac-0:00: phy_eee_rx_clock_stop: clk_stop_enable 1
>
> Presumably, this is when the link comes up before suspend, so the PHY
> has been configured to allow the RX clock to be stopped prior to suspend
>
>> [ 389.086185] dwc-eth-dwmac 2490000.ethernet eth0: configuring for phy/rgmii link mode
>> [ 392.863744] Broadcom BCM89610 stmmac-0:00: phy_eee_rx_clock_stop: clk_stop_enable 1
>
> Presumably, as this is after resume, this is again when the link comes
> up (that's the only time that stmmac calls phy_eee_rx_clock_stop().)
>
>> After this change I see ...
>>
>> [ 4.644614] Broadcom BCM89610 stmmac-0:00: phy_eee_rx_clock_stop: clk_stop_enable 1
>> [ 4.679224] dwc-eth-dwmac 2490000.ethernet eth0: configuring for phy/rgmii link mode
>> [ 191.219828] dwc-eth-dwmac 2490000.ethernet eth0: configuring for phy/rgmii link mode
>
> To me, this looks no different - the PHY was configured for clock stop
> before suspending in both cases.
>
> However, something else to verify with the old code - after boot and the
> link comes up (so you get the second phy_eee_rx_clock_stop() at 7s),
> try unplugging the link and re-plugging it. Then try suspending.
OK will do. I will have to try that when I am back in the office next week.
> The point of this test is to verify whether the PHY ignores changes to
> the RX clock stop configuration while the link is up.
>
>
>
> The next stage is to instrument dwmac4_set_eee_mode(),
> dwmac4_reset_eee_mode() and dwmac4_set_eee_lpi_entry_timer() to print
> the final register values in each function vs dwmac4_set_lpi_mode() in
> the new code. Also, I think instrumenting stmmac_common_interrupt() to
> print a message when we get either CORE_IRQ_TX_PATH_IN_LPI_MODE or
> CORE_IRQ_TX_PATH_EXIT_LPI_MODE indicating a change in LPI state would
> be a good idea.
>
> I'd like to see how this all ties up with suspend, resume, link up
> and down events, so please don't trim the log so much.
OK thanks. I will instrument these too and get some more logs.
Cheers!
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists