[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f6e9e0b-1a5f-4129-9a88-ad612b6c6e3b@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 12:33:59 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
willemb@...gle.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v11 09/12] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TS_ACK_OPT_CB
callback
On 2/13/25 5:00 PM, Jason Xing wrote:
> diff --git a/net/dsa/user.c b/net/dsa/user.c
> index 291ab1b4acc4..794fe553dd77 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/user.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/user.c
> @@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static void dsa_skb_tx_timestamp(struct dsa_user_priv *p,
> {
> struct dsa_switch *ds = p->dp->ds;
>
> - if (!(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP))
> + if (!(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP_NOBPF))
This change should be in patch 8.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> index 262a28b59c7f..517de433d4bb 100644
> --- a/net/socket.c
> +++ b/net/socket.c
> @@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ void __sock_tx_timestamp(__u32 tsflags, __u8 *tx_flags)
> u8 flags = *tx_flags;
>
> if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE) {
> - flags |= SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP;
> + flags |= SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP_NOBPF;
Same here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists