lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67afc4dfb448f_30f1c129439@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:34:07 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 davem@...emloft.net, 
 edumazet@...gle.com, 
 pabeni@...hat.com, 
 dsahern@...nel.org, 
 horms@...nel.org, 
 Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] net: deduplicate cookie logic

Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:09:46 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> > 
> > Reuse standard sk, ip and ipv6 cookie init handlers where possible.
> > 
> > Avoid repeated open coding of the same logic.
> > Harmonize feature sets across protocols.
> > Make IPv4 and IPv6 logic more alike.
> > Simplify adding future new fields with a single init point.
> 
> Sorry for noticing late, looks like this doesn't apply cleanly:
> 
> Applying: tcp: only initialize sockcm tsflags field
> Applying: net: initialize mark in sockcm_init
> Applying: ipv4: initialize inet socket cookies with sockcm_init
> Applying: ipv4: remove get_rttos
> Applying: icmp: reflect tos through ip cookie rather than updating inet_sk
> Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
> M	net/ipv4/icmp.c
> Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
> Auto-merging net/ipv4/icmp.c
> Applying: ipv6: replace ipcm6_init calls with ipcm6_init_sk
> Applying: ipv6: initialize inet socket cookies with sockcm_init
> 
> So CI didn't consume it..
> 
> Could you rebase & repost?

Done. Sorry about that. Not sure what went wrong. I had v2 on top of
netdev-nn/main as of Feb 11, commit ae9b3c0e79bc ("Merge branch
'tcp-allow-to-reduce-max-rto'").

Now rebased on top of current head at commit 412723d54a8b ("Merge
branch 'net-phylink-xpcs-stmmac-support-pcs-eee-configuration'").

Good point that I could have noticed that something was up by looking
at the CI. Will keep that in mind.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ