[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z7DjfRwd3dbcEXTY@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 18:57:01 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Nicolò Veronese <nicveronese@...il.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, mwojtas@...omium.org,
Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Dimitri Fedrau <dimitri.fedrau@...bherr.com>,
Sean Anderson <seanga2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/15] net: phy: Create a phy_port for
PHY-driven SFPs
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:15:53AM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> Some PHY devices may be used as media-converters to drive SFP ports (for
> example, to allow using SFP when the SoC can only output RGMII). This is
> already supported to some extend by allowing PHY drivers to registers
> themselves as being SFP upstream.
>
> However, the logic to drive the SFP can actually be split to a per-port
> control logic, allowing support for multi-port PHYs, or PHYs that can
> either drive SFPs or Copper.
>
> To that extent, create a phy_port when registering an SFP bus onto a
> PHY. This port is considered a "serdes" port, in that it can feed data
> to anther entity on the link. The PHY driver needs to specify the
> various PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XXX that this port supports.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
With this change, using phy_port requires phylink to also be built in
an appropriate manner. Currently, phylink depends on phylib. phy_port
becomes part of phylib. This patch makes phylib depend on phylink,
thereby creating a circular dependency when modular.
I think a different approach is needed here.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists