[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b4c3254-c596-486a-bde9-d4737dfc5a48@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 17:39:40 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: SkyLake Huang (黃啟澤) <SkyLake.Huang@...iatek.com>
Cc: "daniel@...rotopia.org" <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Steven Liu (劉人豪) <steven.liu@...iatek.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
"dqfext@...il.com" <dqfext@...il.com>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: mediatek: Add token ring access
helper functions in mtk-phy-lib
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 03:35:10AM +0000, SkyLake Huang (黃啟澤) wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-02-13 at 16:34 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >
> > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> > you have verified the sender or the content.
> >
> >
> > > > > Those registers with Mrvl* prefix were originally designed for
> > > > > connection with certain Marvell devices. It's our DSP
> > > > > parameters.
> > > >
> > > > Will this code work with real Marvell devices? Is this PHY
> > > > actually
> > > > licensed from Marvell?
> > >
> > > > From what I understood the tuning of those parameters is required
> > > to connect to a Marvell PHY link partner on the other end.
> >
> > If so, the naming is bad. I assume you need the same settings for
> > Microchip, Atheros, Broadcom, etc. These settings just tune the
> > hardware to be standards conforming?
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> This part is pretty old old old design. Some compatibility issues were
> firstly found on Marvell link partners, so the registers are named
> accordingly. And yes, now, those Kf/Kp settings will be used for
> connection with other link partners. However, if I change the register
> names, it violates our hardware register map application note. If this
> does bother, I can add some comments before these macros like:
>
> /* Mrvl* prefix only means that in the very beginning we tune the
> * parameters with Marvell link partners. These settings will be used
> * for all link partners now.
> */
A comment would be good. The current names lead the questions....
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists