[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7932cd23-571e-4646-b5dd-467ec8106695@nbd.name>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 13:58:44 +0100
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: bridge@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: locally receive all multicast packets if
IFF_ALLMULTI is set
On 17.02.25 12:54, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 2/17/25 13:26, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> If multicast snooping is enabled, multicast packets may not always end up on
>> the local bridge interface, if the host is not a member of the multicast
>> group. Similar to how IFF_PROMISC allows all packets to be received locally,
>> let IFF_ALLMULTI allow all multicast packets to be received.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
>> ---
>> net/bridge/br_input.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
>> index 232133a0fd21..7fa2da6985b5 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
>> @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ int br_handle_frame_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb
>> pkt_type = BR_PKT_MULTICAST;
>> if (br_multicast_rcv(&brmctx, &pmctx, vlan, skb, vid))
>> goto drop;
>> + if (br->dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI)
>> + local_rcv = true;
>> }
>> }
>>
>
> This doesn't look like a bug fix, IMO it should be for net-next.
>
> Also you might miss a mcast stat increase, see the multicast code
> below, the only case that this would cover is the missing "else"
> branch of:
> if ((mdst && mdst->host_joined) ||
> br_multicast_is_router(brmctx, skb)) {
> local_rcv = true;
> DEV_STATS_INC(br->dev, multicast);
> }
>
> So I'd suggest to augment the condition and include this ALLMULTI check there,
> maybe with a comment to mention that all other cases are covered by the current
> code so people are not surprised.
Will do, thanks.
> By the way what is the motivation for supporting this flag? I mean you can
> make the bridge mcast router and it will receive all mcast anyway.
OpenWrt uses a user space daemon for DHCPv6/RA/NDP handling, and in
relay mode it sets the ALLMULTI flag in order to receive all relevant
queries on the network.
This works for normal network interfaces and non-snooping bridges, but
not snooping bridges (unless, as you pointed out, multicast routing is
enabled).
- Felix
Powered by blists - more mailing lists