[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250217152216.5b206284@fedora.home>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 15:22:16 +0100
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit
<hkallweit1@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>, Marek
Behún <kabel@...nel.org>, Oleksij Rempel
<o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Nicolò Veronese
<nicveronese@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
mwojtas@...omium.org, Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Romain
Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>, Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Dimitri Fedrau <dimitri.fedrau@...bherr.com>, Sean Anderson
<seanga2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/15] net: phy: Create a phy_port for
PHY-driven SFPs
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 14:43:00 +0100
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> > One way to avoid that would be to extract out of phylink/phylib all the
> > functions for linkmode handling that aren't tied to phylink/phylib
> > directly, but are about managing the capabilities of each interface,
> > linkmode, speed, duplex, etc. For phylink, that would be :
> >
> > phylink_merge_link_mode
> > phylink_get_capabilities
> > phylink_cap_from_speed_duplex
> > phylink_limit_mac_speed
> > phylink_caps_to_linkmodes
> > phylink_interface_max_speed
> > phylink_interface_signal_rate
> > phylink_is_empty_linkmode
> > phylink_an_mode_str
> > phylink_set_port_modes
>
> ...
>
> > These would go into linkmode.c/h for example, and we'd have a shared set
> > of helpers that we can use in phylink, phylib and phy_port.
>
> Please be careful with the scope of these. Heiner is going through
> phylib and trying to reduce the scope of some of the functions we
> exporting in include/linux/phy.h to just being available in
> drivers/net/phy. That will help stop MAC drivers abuse them. We should
> do the same here, limit what can actually use these helpers to stop
> abuse.
Can we consider having an header file sitting in drivers/net/phy
directly for this kind of things ?
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists