[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<AS8PR04MB8849C54C08DCAFB7C0196E1196FA2@AS8PR04MB8849.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:13:43 +0000
From: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>, "Y.B. Lu" <yangbo.lu@....com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>, "stable@...r.kernel.org"
<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net 1/8] net: enetc: fix the off-by-one issue in
enetc_map_tx_buffs()
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 11:18 AM
[...]
> > enetc_free_tx_frame() call on dma_err path is still needed for count 0
> > because it needs to free the skb.
>
> First, the tx_swbd is not set when count is 0, so tx_swbd->skb is NULL when
> the error occurs.
>
> Second, the skb is freed in enetc_start_xmit() not enetc_free_tx_frame().
Yeah, noticed too finally.
'do {} while()' is not ok on error path here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists