netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 13/14] net: ethernet: qualcomm: Add PPE debugfs support for PPE counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <92d5f50d-efc0-462b-8cd2-e73ba77222e5@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:16:24 +0800
From: Jie Luo <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
        "David S. Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
	<kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring
	<robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lei Wei <quic_leiwei@...cinc.com>,
        Suruchi Agarwal
	<quic_suruchia@...cinc.com>,
        Pavithra R <quic_pavir@...cinc.com>,
        "Simon
 Horman" <horms@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook
	<kees@...nel.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        "Philipp
 Zabel" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_kkumarcs@...cinc.com>, <quic_linchen@...cinc.com>,
        <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
        <john@...ozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 13/14] net: ethernet: qualcomm: Add PPE
 debugfs support for PPE counters



On 2/14/2025 10:02 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>> +/* The number of packets dropped because of no buffer available, no PPE
>>>> + * buffer assigned to these packets.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static void ppe_port_rx_drop_counter_get(struct ppe_device *ppe_dev,
>>>> +					 struct seq_file *seq)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	u32 reg, drop_cnt = 0;
>>>> +	int ret, i, tag = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +	PRINT_COUNTER_PREFIX("PRX_DROP_CNT", "SILENT_DROP:");
>>>> +	for (i = 0; i < PPE_DROP_CNT_TBL_ENTRIES; i++) {
>>>> +		reg = PPE_DROP_CNT_TBL_ADDR + i * PPE_DROP_CNT_TBL_INC;
>>>> +		ret = ppe_pkt_cnt_get(ppe_dev, reg, PPE_PKT_CNT_SIZE_1WORD,
>>>> +				      &drop_cnt, NULL);
>>>> +		if (ret) {
>>>> +			seq_printf(seq, "ERROR %d\n", ret);
>>>> +			return;
>>>> +		}
>>>
>>> This is an error getting the value from the hardware? You should not
>>> put that into the debugfs itself, you want the read() call to return
>>> it.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, this error code is returned by regmap read functions in
>> ppe_pkt_cnt_get() when the hardware counter read fails. I will
>> remove it from debugfs file and instead log the error to the
>> console (dev_info).
> 
> and return it to user space via the read() call. These functions
> normally return the number of bytes put into the buffer. But you can
> also return a negative error code which gets passed back to user space
> instead.
> 
> 	Andrew

OK, I will return the negative error code returned by the read() to the
user space, thanks.