[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<173984163176.3591662.6324124388363934052.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 01:20:31 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, julianr@...ux.ibm.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, twinkler@...ux.ibm.com, horms@...nel.org,
wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com, gbayer@...ux.ibm.com,
pasic@...ux.ibm.com, raspl@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] s390/ism: add release function for struct device
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 13:01:37 +0100 you wrote:
> From: Julian Ruess <julianr@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> According to device_release() in /drivers/base/core.c,
> a device without a release function is a broken device
> and must be fixed.
>
> The current code directly frees the device after calling device_add()
> without waiting for other kernel parts to release their references.
> Thus, a reference could still be held to a struct device,
> e.g., by sysfs, leading to potential use-after-free
> issues if a proper release function is not set.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] s390/ism: add release function for struct device
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/915e34d5ad35
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists