[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f3b3cef-e623-4c02-af71-9d1f861075d1@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 18:16:28 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: allow small head cache usage with large
MAX_SKB_FRAGS values
On 2/18/25 3:50 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 2/18/25 2:43 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 3:48 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/12/25 9:47 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
>>>> index 5b2b04835688f65daa25ca208e29775326520e1e..a14ab14c14f1bd6275ab2d1d93bf230b6be14f49
>>>> 100644
>>>> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
>>>> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
>>>> @@ -56,7 +56,11 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(u32, tcp_tw_isn);
>>>>
>>>> void tcp_time_wait(struct sock *sk, int state, int timeo);
>>>>
>>>> -#define MAX_TCP_HEADER L1_CACHE_ALIGN(128 + MAX_HEADER)
>>>> +#define MAX_TCP_HEADER L1_CACHE_ALIGN(64 + MAX_HEADER)
>>>
>>> I'm sorry for the latency following-up here, I really want to avoid
>>> another fiasco.
>>>
>>> If I read correctly, you see the warning on top of my patch because you
>>> have the above chunk in your local tree, am I correct?
>>
>> Not at all, simply using upstream trees, perhaps a different .config
>> than yours ?
>
> Could you please share the conf, if you have that still handy?
Please ignore, the needed config is actually quite obvious. I did not
take in account that my running config here had a few common options
stripped down.
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists