lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250218043210.732959-4-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 20:32:09 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Qiang Zhang <dtzq01@...il.com>,
	Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@...il.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: [Patch net 3/4] flow_dissector: Fix port range key handling in BPF conversion

Fix how port range keys are handled in __skb_flow_bpf_to_target() by:
- Separating PORTS and PORTS_RANGE key handling
- Using correct key_ports_range structure for range keys
- Properly initializing both key types independently

This ensures port range information is correctly stored in its dedicated
structure rather than incorrectly using the regular ports key structure.

Fixes: 59fb9b62fb6c ("flow_dissector: Fix to use new variables for port ranges in bpf hook")
Reported-by: Qiang Zhang <dtzq01@...il.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAPx+-5uvFxkhkz4=j_Xuwkezjn9U6kzKTD5jz4tZ9msSJ0fOJA@mail.gmail.com/
Cc: Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@...il.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
---
 net/core/flow_dissector.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
index c33af3ef0b79..9cd8de6bebb5 100644
--- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
+++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
@@ -931,6 +931,7 @@ static void __skb_flow_bpf_to_target(const struct bpf_flow_keys *flow_keys,
 				     struct flow_dissector *flow_dissector,
 				     void *target_container)
 {
+	struct flow_dissector_key_ports_range *key_ports_range = NULL;
 	struct flow_dissector_key_ports *key_ports = NULL;
 	struct flow_dissector_key_control *key_control;
 	struct flow_dissector_key_basic *key_basic;
@@ -975,20 +976,21 @@ static void __skb_flow_bpf_to_target(const struct bpf_flow_keys *flow_keys,
 		key_control->addr_type = FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_IPV6_ADDRS;
 	}
 
-	if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS))
+	if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS)) {
 		key_ports = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
 						      FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS,
 						      target_container);
-	else if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
-				    FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE))
-		key_ports = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
-						      FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE,
-						      target_container);
-
-	if (key_ports) {
 		key_ports->src = flow_keys->sport;
 		key_ports->dst = flow_keys->dport;
 	}
+	if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
+			       FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE)) {
+		key_ports_range = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
+							    FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE,
+							    target_container);
+		key_ports_range->tp.src = flow_keys->sport;
+		key_ports_range->tp.dst = flow_keys->dport;
+	}
 
 	if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
 			       FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_FLOW_LABEL)) {
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ