[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SJ0PR18MB5216E1ADBDAD93D50FF24300DBC52@SJ0PR18MB5216.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:46:05 +0000
From: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Geethasowjanya Akula
<gakula@...vell.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>, Jerin
Jacob <jerinj@...vell.com>,
"john.fastabend@...il.com"
<john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>,
"hawk@...nel.org" <hawk@...nel.org>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org"
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"larysa.zaremba@...el.com" <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [net-next PATCH v6 6/6] octeontx2-pf: AF_XDP zero
copy transmit support
>> +void otx2_zc_napi_handler(struct otx2_nic *pfvf, struct xsk_buff_pool
>*pool,
>> + int queue, int budget)
>> +{
>> + struct xdp_desc *xdp_desc = pool->tx_descs;
>> + int err, i, work_done = 0, batch;
>> +
>> + budget = min(budget, otx2_read_free_sqe(pfvf, queue));
>> + batch = xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(pool, budget);
>> + if (!batch)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < batch; i++) {
>> + dma_addr_t dma_addr;
>> +
>> + dma_addr = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(pool, xdp_desc[i].addr);
>> + err = otx2_xdp_sq_append_pkt(pfvf, NULL, dma_addr,
>xdp_desc[i].len,
>> + queue, OTX2_AF_XDP_FRAME);
>> + if (!err) {
>> + netdev_err(pfvf->netdev, "AF_XDP: Unable to transfer
>packet
>> +err%d\n", err);
>
>Here `err` is always 0, dumping it's value is quite confusing.
>
>The root cause is that otx2_xdp_sq_append_pkt() returns a success
>boolean value, the variable holding it should possibly be renamed
>accordingly.
>
>Since this is the only nit I could find, I think we are better without a
>repost, but please follow-up on this chunk soon.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Paolo
[Suman] Sure, I will push a follow-up patch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists