lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACKFLinkP2aakfuBP7rC0Z28qb6jf3_WKVS5W8Q5LPmHZAum7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 13:28:44 -0800
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, 
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 12/12] eth: bnxt: remove most dependencies on RTNL

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 12:30 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me> wrote:
>
> Only devlink and sriov paths are grabbing rtnl explicitly. The rest is
> covered by netdev instance lock which the core now grabs, so there is
> no need to manage rtnl in most places anymore.
>
> On the core side we can now try to drop rtnl in some places
> (do_setlink for example) for the drivers that signal non-rtnl
> mode (TBD).
>
> Boot-tested and with `ethtool -L eth1 combined 24` to trigger reset.
>
> Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>

A typo in a comment below.  Otherwise it looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>

> @@ -13965,30 +13967,30 @@ static void bnxt_timer(struct timer_list *t)
>         mod_timer(&bp->timer, jiffies + bp->current_interval);
>  }
>
> -static void bnxt_rtnl_lock_sp(struct bnxt *bp)
> +static void bnxt_lock_sp(struct bnxt *bp)
>  {
>         /* We are called from bnxt_sp_task which has BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK
>          * set.  If the device is being closed, bnxt_close() may be holding
> -        * rtnl() and waiting for BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK to clear.  So we
> -        * must clear BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK before holding rtnl().
> +        * netdev instance lock and waiting for BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK to clear.
> +        * So we must clear BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK before holding rtnl().

... before holding netdev instance lock.

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4209 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ