netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: fix ktls panic with sockmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250219052015.274405-2-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 13:20:14 +0800
From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: borisp@...dia.com,
	john.fastabend@...il.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	horms@...nel.org,
	andrii@...nel.org,
	eddyz87@...il.com,
	mykolal@...com,
	ast@...nel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net,
	martin.lau@...ux.dev,
	song@...nel.org,
	yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
	kpsingh@...nel.org,
	sdf@...ichev.me,
	haoluo@...gle.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org,
	shuah@...nel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	mrpre@....com,
	Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: fix ktls panic with sockmap

[ 2172.936997] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 2172.936999] kernel BUG at lib/iov_iter.c:629!
......
[ 2172.944996] PKRU: 55555554
[ 2172.945155] Call Trace:
[ 2172.945299]  <TASK>
[ 2172.945428]  ? die+0x36/0x90
[ 2172.945601]  ? do_trap+0xdd/0x100
[ 2172.945795]  ? iov_iter_revert+0x178/0x180
[ 2172.946031]  ? iov_iter_revert+0x178/0x180
[ 2172.946267]  ? do_error_trap+0x7d/0x110
[ 2172.946499]  ? iov_iter_revert+0x178/0x180
[ 2172.946736]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70
[ 2172.946961]  ? iov_iter_revert+0x178/0x180
[ 2172.947197]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
[ 2172.947446]  ? iov_iter_revert+0x178/0x180
[ 2172.947683]  ? iov_iter_revert+0x5c/0x180
[ 2172.947913]  tls_sw_sendmsg_locked.isra.0+0x794/0x840
[ 2172.948206]  tls_sw_sendmsg+0x52/0x80
[ 2172.948420]  ? inet_sendmsg+0x1f/0x70
[ 2172.948634]  __sys_sendto+0x1cd/0x200
[ 2172.948848]  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[ 2172.949072]  ? syscall_trace_enter+0x140/0x270
[ 2172.949330]  ? __lock_release.isra.0+0x5e/0x170
[ 2172.949595]  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[ 2172.949817]  ? syscall_trace_enter+0x140/0x270
[ 2172.950211]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xda/0x190
[ 2172.950632]  ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xc2/0xd0
[ 2172.951036]  __x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30
[ 2172.951382]  do_syscall_64+0x90/0x170
......

After calling bpf_exec_tx_verdict(), the size of msg_pl->sg may increase,
e.g., when the BPF program executes bpf_msg_push_data().

If the BPF program sets cork_bytes and sg.size is smaller than cork_bytes,
it will return -ENOSPC and attempt to roll back to the non-zero copy
logic. However, during rollback, msg->msg_iter is reset, but since
msg_pl->sg.size has been increased, subsequent executions will exceed the
actual size of msg_iter.
'''
iov_iter_revert(&msg->msg_iter, msg_pl->sg.size - orig_size);
'''

The changes in this commit are based on the following considerations:

1. When cork_bytes is set, rolling back to non-zero copy logic is
pointless and can directly go to zero-copy logic.

2. We can not calculate the correct number of bytes to revert msg_iter.

Assume the original data is "abcdefgh" (8 bytes), and after 3 pushes
by the BPF program, it becomes 11-byte data: "abc?de?fgh?".
Then, we set cork_bytes to 6, which means the first 6 bytes have been
processed, and the remaining 5 bytes "?fgh?" will be cached until the
length meets the cork_bytes requirement.

However, some data in "?fgh?" is not within 'sg->msg_iter'
(but in msg_pl instead), especially the data "?" we pushed.

So it doesn't seem as simple as just reverting through an offset of
msg_iter.

3. For non-TLS sockets in tcp_bpf_sendmsg, when a "cork" situation occurs,
the user-space send() doesn't return an error, and the returned length is
the same as the input length parameter, even if some data is cached.

Additionally, I saw that the current non-zero-copy logic for handling
corking is written as:
'''
line 1177
else if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
	if (ret == -ENOSPC)
		ret = 0;
	goto send_end;
'''

So it's ok to just return 'copied' without error when a "cork" situation
occurs.

Fixes: fcb14cb1bdac ("new iov_iter flavour - ITER_UBUF")
Fixes: d3b18ad31f93 ("tls: add bpf support to sk_msg handling")
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev>
---
 net/tls/tls_sw.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 914d4e1516a3..f3d7d19482da 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -1120,9 +1120,13 @@ static int tls_sw_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
 					num_async++;
 				else if (ret == -ENOMEM)
 					goto wait_for_memory;
-				else if (ctx->open_rec && ret == -ENOSPC)
+				else if (ctx->open_rec && ret == -ENOSPC) {
+					if (msg_pl->cork_bytes) {
+						ret = 0;
+						goto send_end;
+					}
 					goto rollback_iter;
-				else if (ret != -EAGAIN)
+				} else if (ret != -EAGAIN)
 					goto send_end;
 			}
 			continue;
-- 
2.47.1