netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] selftests: drv-net: add a way to wait for a local process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z7dmkkgJx0deq3_g@mini-arch>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:29:54 -0800
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org,
	jdamato@...tly.com, petrm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] selftests: drv-net: add a way to wait
 for a local process

On 02/19, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> We use wait_port_listen() extensively to wait for a process
> we spawned to be ready. Not all processes will open listening
> sockets. Add a method of explicitly waiting for a child to
> be ready. Pass a FD to the spawned process and wait for it
> to write a message to us. FD number is passed via KSFT_READY_FD
> env variable.
> 
> Similarly use KSFT_WAIT_FD to let the child process for a sign
> that we are done and child should exit. Sending a signal to
> a child with shell=True can get tricky.
> 
> Make use of this method in the queues test to make it less flaky.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>