[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8936f8a7-5bc0-417b-a719-806f1ce0904b@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:49:21 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
richardcochran@...il.com, geert+renesas@...der.be,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, nfraprado@...labora.com,
quic_tdas@...cinc.com, biju.das.jz@...renesas.com,
elinor.montmasson@...oirfairelinux.com, ross.burton@....com,
javier.carrasco@...fvision.net, quic_anusha@...cinc.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: quic_srichara@...cinc.com, quic_varada@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/6] dt-bindings: clock: Add ipq9574 NSSCC clock and
reset definitions
On 21.02.2025 11:14 AM, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
> From: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
>
> Add NSSCC clock and reset definitions for ipq9574.
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
> ---
[...]
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-gcc.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq-cmn-pll.h>
> + clock-controller@...00000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-nsscc";
> + reg = <0x39b00000 0x80000>;
> + clocks = <&xo_board_clk>,
> + <&cmn_pll NSS_1200MHZ_CLK>,
> + <&cmn_pll PPE_353MHZ_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GPLL0_OUT_AUX>,
> + <&uniphy 0>,
> + <&uniphy 1>,
> + <&uniphy 2>,
> + <&uniphy 3>,
> + <&uniphy 4>,
> + <&uniphy 5>,
> + <&gcc GCC_NSSCC_CLK>;
> + clock-names = "xo",
> + "nss_1200",
> + "ppe_353",
> + "gpll0_out",
> + "uniphy0_rx",
> + "uniphy0_tx",
> + "uniphy1_rx",
> + "uniphy1_tx",
> + "uniphy2_rx",
> + "uniphy2_tx",
> + "nsscc";
I see that the input clock is named rather non-descriptively, but maybe
we should call it something like "bus" so that it has more meaning to
the reader
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists