[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3fbe3955-48b8-449d-93ff-2699a7efcd8d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:30:09 +0800
From: "Abdul Rahim, Faizal" <faizal.abdul.rahim@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Xiaolei Wang <xiaolei.wang@...driver.com>,
Suraj Jaiswal <quic_jsuraj@...cinc.com>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v5 1/9] net: ethtool: mm: extract stmmac
verification logic into common library
On 21/2/2025 6:43 pm, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 06:24:09PM +0800, Furong Xu wrote:
>> Your fix is better when link is up/down, so I vote verify_enabled.
>
> Hmmm... I thought this was a bug in stmmac that was carried over to
> ethtool_mmsv, but it looks like it isn't.
>
> In fact, looking at the original refactoring patch I had attached in
> this email:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241217002254.lyakuia32jbnva46@skbuf/
>
> these 2 lines in ethtool_mmsv_link_state_handle() didn't exist at all.
>
> } else {
>>>>> mmsv->status = ETHTOOL_MM_VERIFY_STATUS_INITIAL;
>>>>> mmsv->verify_retries = ETHTOOL_MM_MAX_VERIFY_RETRIES;
>
> /* No link or pMAC not enabled */
> ethtool_mmsv_configure_pmac(mmsv, false);
> ethtool_mmsv_configure_tx(mmsv, false);
> }
>
> Faizal, could you remind me why they were added? I don't see this
> explained in change logs.
>
Hi Vladimir,
Yeah, it wasn’t there originally. I added that change because it failed the
link down/link up test.
After a successful verification, if the link partner goes down, the status
still shows ETHTOOL_MM_VERIFY_STATUS_SUCCEEDED, which isn’t correct—so
that’s why I added it.
Sorry for not mentioning it earlier. I assumed you’d check the delta
between the original patch and the upstream one, my bad, should have
mentioned this logic change.
Should I update it to the latest suggestion?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists