[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7bf9577f4b6dcb818785be73c175bcd19b3b4f0c.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 06:33:44 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Drew
Fustini <drew@...7.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Fu Wei
<wefu@...hat.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, Maxime Coquelin
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: stmmac: thead: clean up clock rate
setting
On Sun, 2025-02-23 at 11:40 +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Adding Joe Perches.
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 02:15:17PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
[]
> I've been investigating why the NIPA bot complains about maintainers
> not being Cc'd, such as for patch 1 of this series:
>
> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/static/nipa/936447/13985595/cc_maintainers/stdout
Additional maintainers added or missing?
> So, it seems running get_maintainer.pl on an email received from
> mailing lists without first stripping many of the email headers can
> lead to false K: matches.
My guess is the nipa bot should exec get_maintainer.pl with the
--nokeywords option on some pass it uses after cc's are added.
Or are you suggesting that lines that start with "to:" or "cc:"
should be ignored by the get_maintainer keyword test?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists